Showing posts with label Keystone XL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keystone XL. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
Keystone XL: President Obama's pipeline
This nicely crafted op-ed lays out, in succinct terms, why the president should just say no to the pipeline monster known as Keystone XL. So, Mr. Obama, just say no.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Obama's Keystone decision: Just say NO, Mr. President
This NY Times op-ed I just read spells out - quite clearly - why the president should just say no to the monster we know as the Keystone XL pipeline. So, Mr. President, just say no
Burlington-area Vermonters protest the Keystone debacle
I wish I had been able to attend this, but the e-mail advertising this and other protest rallies in Vermont did not, unfortunately, list times and dates. Oh well. I did join friends from Pennsylvania in the giant protest rally in Washington D.C. last year. Great fun.
Friday, January 31, 2014
Keystone pipeline: State says it'll be OK, but?
Folks, let's remember that Earth is our only planet. And let's not forget what tar sands mining is doing to Canada's boreal forest -- the forest that used to be a major carbon sink. The NY Times offered this coverage last evening about the State Department's study/report.
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Keystone pipeline could harm wildlife, Interior Department says
The LA Times notes: "A letter contradicts the State Department's draft environmental
assessment of the pipeline, saying animals could suffer lasting damage."
Hah, I was present at the very protest rally at which the picture with this article was taken. Yahoo! In any case, my only concern with the findings contained in Interior's letter is this: What took so long?
Interior, in its letter, says, in part: "species displacement, increased predation rates and predator travel lanes, increased nest parasitism, vehicle collisions with wildlife … invasive plant species, increased wildfire risk, lower wildlife density, increase in collisions with power lines and electrocutions on power poles … and increase in poaching."
What is so damn hard to understand about this? Just the roads and other infrastructure that would go in as teh pipeline is built would harm our natural heritage.
Hah, I was present at the very protest rally at which the picture with this article was taken. Yahoo! In any case, my only concern with the findings contained in Interior's letter is this: What took so long?
Interior, in its letter, says, in part: "species displacement, increased predation rates and predator travel lanes, increased nest parasitism, vehicle collisions with wildlife … invasive plant species, increased wildfire risk, lower wildlife density, increase in collisions with power lines and electrocutions on power poles … and increase in poaching."
What is so damn hard to understand about this? Just the roads and other infrastructure that would go in as teh pipeline is built would harm our natural heritage.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
The Keystone XL debacle and Nebraska and Nebraskans
This op-ed authored by a Nebraskan talks about the building of community to battle an on-rushing monster, a crude oil pipeline. All Americans would do well to join the clan of Nebraskans fighting to keep the Cornhuysker State free of the TransCanada pipeline edebacle/boondoggle.
Friday, April 5, 2013
Obama tells donors of tough pollitics on environment
I continue shaking my head in wonderment over the jobs vs. clean air, clean water, healthy land, healthy fish and wildlife populations because that is the undercurrent the mainstream media outlets continue to blather on about. This article explores what the president said/did during his just-finished fund-raising expedition to California.
Monday, March 11, 2013
When to say no (to the Keystone boondoggle)
"Boondoggle" is an appropriate word for the Keystone XL pipeline, for that is exactly what it is. And that boondoggle would be a bigtime generator to our planet's carbon load. Just say no, Mr. President. And the sooner, the better. The NY Times published this editorial today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)